In the context of COA Comparison, what is one of the key outputs?

One of the key outputs of the Course of Action (COA) Comparison phase is a recommended course of action. During this phase, various COAs are evaluated against established criteria, such as suitability, feasibility, acceptability, completeness, and risk. The purpose of comparing the COAs is to determine which one best satisfies the commander's intent and mission objectives while adhering to the constraints of the operational environment.

Throughout the COA Comparison process, each COA is assessed for its strengths and weaknesses. The team weighs various factors, such as the anticipated outcome, resource requirements, and potential risks involved with each option. The culmination of this analysis results in the identification of a recommended course of action that aligns best with the mission requirements and goals. This recommendation will guide the decision-making process as the commander prepares to issue orders for implementation.

While other choices might represent relevant aspects of COA development or tactical considerations, they do not directly capture the integral function of summarizing which COA is preferred based on thorough evaluation and analysis.